Call: 847.544.0118

Email: ksj@twelve8.net

Syndication

RSS feed RSS 2.0

Categories

An apparent Firefox 3.5 bug

September 18, 2009

In my new job I recently discovered what seems to be a bug in Firefox 3.5: when there is a link (or anything else to which an outline could apply, i.e., any element with an :active state or a tabindex) that is floated (i.e. float: left or float: right) inside a container with overflow set to auto, the outline on that link will take up space, contrary to the W3C spec. This means that such a link, if it fills the container in either the X or Y dimension, will cause scrollbars to appear when it is active (tabbed to or pressed).

But there’s a fix: If you apply CSS outline-offset with a negative value, e.g. outline-offset: -2px;, I suspect it still takes up space (in a sense), BUT that space is inside the element’s current boundaries, so no harm done (unless you really needed that outline to conform precisely to the boundaries.

A clever bit of CSS

June 30, 2009

A while ago, I was directed to this prototype for the mozilla.org redesign, notable particularly for it’s use of an intelligent, fluid grid. I bookmarked it within a folder I keep for quick design inspiration, since there are several aspects of the design that I think are pretty great. Looking at it again the other day, I discovered a clever bit of CSS coding.…

Continue reading.

Update: How not to do progressive enhancement

May 6, 2009

Related to: How not to do progressive enhancement.

I actually heard from Paramore|Redd today—a very nice surprise! Joel Steidl from P|R pointed me to the jQuery History plug-in, which seems to make possible just the sort of functionality I was getting at. Turns out, P|R was well aware of the small issue I pointed out, and is using the plug-in to great effect on their “Peeps” section, e.g. Joel’s own page. Browse through the employees using the forward and back buttons on the page and you’ll find that, while the page never reloads, the browser’s forward and back buttons work just fine. Bravo! Thanks for the reply, Joel.

How not to do progressive enhancement

May 4, 2009

I had a somewhat unfortunate experience with JavaScript-based progressive enhancement today. It came at the hands of Nashville’s Paramore|Redd. To be clear, I’m not hating on the company; they obviously do great work.Their website just happened to exemplify a pretty common usability shortcoming.…

Continue reading.

Where are all the sliders?

April 19, 2009

I was helping my dad shop for a new printer today, and came away frustrated. I was primarily reading reviews on CNET (uhh, I mean c|net). What pissed me off was the system for sorting by price. My options were “Less than $100,” “$100–$200,” etc. This is pretty typical. But what if I want less than $200? Or $100–$300? This is where sliders should come into play, so I can choose the low-end and high-end myself. It’s late at the moment, and I can’t think of how this would be done with progressive enhancement, except to default to the faulty method and replace the whole thing dynamically with JavaScript. I’m not sure how it would be done with consistent HTML code. There may be a solution out there and in any rate I’ll mull it over and maybe put a demo together. Regardless, why are sliders not the norm?

Did you know…?

In a recent month, I read 4,347 blog posts in Google reader, nearly all of which related to design or web development.

How do I get in touch?

Brighten my day with an email.

Or, if you know that you’re interested in working with twelve8, fill out this project idea sheet and send it to ksj{at}twelve8.net .

Or give me a call. It’s 847.544.0118

You can also download my vCard

© 2009 Kyle Jacobson. All rights reserved | Accessibility statement